4.6 Review

Roles of DNA damage in renal tubular epithelial cells injury

期刊

FRONTIERS IN PHYSIOLOGY
卷 14, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2023.1162546

关键词

DNA damage; tubular epithelial cells; DNA repair; DDR; AKI (acute kidney injury); CKD-chronic kidney disease

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The prevalence of renal diseases is increasing globally, yet the pathogenesis and effective treatments are still unclear. DNA damage and the related DNA damage response have been identified as common factors in acute kidney injury (AKI) and chronic kidney disease (CKD). Reactive oxygen species induced DNA damage is a common type involved in the development of these conditions. Recent developments in the field of DNA damage have provided insights into the role of DNA damage and DNA damage response in renal tubular epithelial cell injury. Focusing on DNA damage and DNA damage response may offer valuable diagnostic biomarkers and treatment strategies for renal diseases.
The prevalence of renal diseases including acute kidney injury (AKI) and chronic kidney disease (CKD) is increasing worldwide. However, the pathogenesis of most renal diseases is still unclear and effective treatments are still lacking. DNA damage and the related DNA damage response (DDR) have been confirmed as common pathogenesis of acute kidney injury and chronic kidney disease. Reactive oxygen species (ROS) induced DNA damage is one of the most common types of DNA damage involved in the pathogenesis of acute kidney injury and chronic kidney disease. In recent years, several developments have been made in the field of DNA damage. Herein, we review the roles and developments of DNA damage and DNA damage response in renal tubular epithelial cell injury in acute kidney injury and chronic kidney disease. In this review, we conclude that focusing on DNA damage and DNA damage response may provide valuable diagnostic biomarkers and treatment strategies for renal diseases including acute kidney injury and chronic kidney disease.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据