4.6 Review

Neurophysiological mechanisms of transcranial alternating current stimulation

期刊

FRONTIERS IN NEUROSCIENCE
卷 17, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2023.1091925

关键词

transcranial alternating current stimulation; neurophysiological mechanisms; neural entrainment; animal models; translation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Neuronal oscillations are crucial for temporal coordination and brain functions, and transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) has shown potential in enhancing cognition. However, the variability and translatability of tACS results are challenging, and a thorough understanding of its mechanisms is essential. Animal models provide insights into tACS mechanisms, parameter optimization, and rational design, aiming to improve validity and reproducibility. This review discusses recent electrophysiological advances in tACS using animal models, addressing important issues for result coordination and translation.
Neuronal oscillations are the primary basis for precise temporal coordination of neuronal processing and are linked to different brain functions. Transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) has demonstrated promising potential in improving cognition by entraining neural oscillations. Despite positive findings in recent decades, the results obtained are sometimes rife with variance and replicability problems, and the findings translation to humans is quite challenging. A thorough understanding of the mechanisms underlying tACS is necessitated for accurate interpretation of experimental results. Animal models are useful for understanding tACS mechanisms, optimizing parameter administration, and improving rational design for broad horizons of tACS. Here, we review recent electrophysiological advances in tACS from animal models, as well as discuss some critical issues for results coordination and translation. We hope to provide an overview of neurophysiological mechanisms and recommendations for future consideration to improve its validity, specificity, and reproducibility.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据