4.5 Article

Neural stem cell-derived extracellular vesicles favour neuronal differentiation and plasticity under stress conditions

期刊

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fnmol.2023.1146592

关键词

extracellular vesicles; neural stem cell; neuronal differentiation; dendritic spines; neuronal plasticity; stress conditions

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Extracellular vesicles (EVs) released by all cell types, including neural stem cells (NSCs), play a crucial role in intercellular communication. In this study, we demonstrated that NSC-derived EVs (NSC-EVs) enhance NSC proliferation, promote neuronal differentiation, and restore the proliferative potential of NSCs affected by oxidative stress. Furthermore, we found that NSC-EVs ameliorate damage burden in neurons induced by inflammation. These findings highlight the therapeutic potential of NSC-EVs in brain tissue regeneration.
Extracellular vesicles (EVs) are released by all cell types and are involved in intercellular communication. We evaluated if neural stem cells-derived EVs (NSC-EVs) regulate NSCs proliferation and differentiation under control and stress conditions. We found that NSC-EVs treatment increases cell proliferation and promotes neuronal differentiation and plasticity. The fact that nervous tissue poorly recovers after cellular damage, prump us to evaluate the effect of EVs supplementation under oxidative stress and inflammation. We demonstrate that NSC-EVs restore the proliferative potential of the NSCs affected by oxidative stress. In addition, we provide evidence that oxidative stress and inflammation induce neuronal differentiation. Interestingly, the aberrant cell phenotype induced by inflammation is restored by NSC-EVs treatment, suggesting that these vesicles ameliorate the damage burden in neurons and modulate neuronal plasticity. These results contribute to understand the role of the NSCs-derived EVs as key players for brain tissue generation and regeneration and open new pathways to the development of therapies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据