4.5 Review

Biomarkers and the outcomes of ischemic stroke

期刊

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fnmol.2023.1171101

关键词

biomarker; ischemic stroke; prediction; stroke; prognosis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This review summarizes a range of important biomarkers, including glutamate, S100B, glial fibrillary acidic protein, receptor for advanced glycation end-products, intercellular adhesion molecule-1, von willebrand factor, matrix metalloproteinase-9, interleukin-6, tumor necrosis factor-a, activated protein C, copeptin, neuron-specific enolase, tau protein, gamma-aminobutyric acid, blood glucose, endothelial progenitor cells, and circulating CD34-positive cells, which may potentially indicate the disease burden and/or predict clinical outcomes of ischemic stroke. The relationship between specific biomarkers, disease burden, and outcomes is examined, along with potential underlying mechanisms. The clinical significance and implications of these biomarkers are also discussed.
Biomarkers are measurable substances that could be used as objective indicators for disease diagnosis, responses to treatments, and outcomes predictions. In this review, we summarized the data on a number of important biomarkers including glutamate, S100B, glial fibrillary acidic protein, receptor for advanced glycation end-products, intercellular adhesion molecule-1, von willebrand factor, matrix metalloproteinase-9, interleukin-6, tumor necrosis factor-a, activated protein C, copeptin, neuron-specific enolase, tau protein, gamma aminobutyric acid, blood glucose, endothelial progenitor cells, and circulating CD34-positive cells that could be potentially used to indicate the disease burden and/or predict clinical outcome of ischemic stroke. We examined the relationship between specific biomarkers and disease burden and outcomes and discussed the potential mechanisms underlying the relationship. The clinical significance and implications of these biomarkers were also discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据