4.5 Article

Functional regionalization of the differentiating cerebellar Purkinje cell population occurs in an activity-dependent manner

期刊

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fnmol.2023.1166900

关键词

zebrafish; cerebellum; Purkinje cell; functional regionalization; calcium imaging; optogenetics; spine density

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The cerebellum exhibits functional regionalization in processing motor and sensory inputs. This study demonstrates that the establishment of specific functional domains in Purkinje cell (PC) layer during cerebellum development is driven by physiological activity of maturing PCs. Additionally, the formation of new dendritic spines parallels the time course of functional domain development.
IntroductionThe cerebellum is organized into functional regions each dedicated to process different motor or sensory inputs for controlling different locomotor behaviors. This functional regionalization is prominent in the evolutionary conserved single-cell layered Purkinje cell (PC) population. Fragmented gene expression domains suggest a genetic organization of PC layer regionalization during cerebellum development. However, the establishment of such functionally specific domains during PC differentiation remained elusive. Methods and resultsWe show the progressive emergence of functional regionalization of PCs from broad responses to spatially restricted regions in zebrafish by means of in vivo Ca2+-imaging during stereotypic locomotive behavior. Moreover, we reveal that formation of new dendritic spines during cerebellar development using in vivo imaging parallels the time course of functional domain development. Pharmacological as well as cell-type specific optogenetic inhibition of PC neuronal activity results in reduced PC dendritic spine density and an altered stagnant pattern of functional domain formation in the PC layer. DiscussionHence, our study suggests that functional regionalization of the PC layer is driven by physiological activity of maturing PCs themselves.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据