4.3 Article

A pharmacological overview of aprepitant for the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting

期刊

EXPERT REVIEW OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY
卷 16, 期 6, 页码 491-505

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/17512433.2023.2209722

关键词

Aprepitant; Antiemetics; Fosaprepitant; NK-1 antagonist; PONV

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Post-operative nausea and vomiting (PONV) affects a significant percentage of surgical patients, and neurokinin-1 receptor antagonists, such as aprepitant, have shown promise in preventing PONV with high efficacy and fewer side effects compared to other antiemetics.
IntroductionPost-operative nausea and vomiting (PONV) affects 30% of all patients undergoing surgery and up to 80% of high-risk patients. Antiemetics for PONV prophylaxis target a variety of receptor systems, with varying degrees of efficacy and side effect profile. Neurokinin -1 receptor antagonists are the most recent class of compounds investigated for PONV prophylaxis, with aprepitant being the only one currently approved for this indication.Areas coveredThis review covers the pathophysiology of PONV, current recommendations for PONV prophylaxis, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of aprepitant, and the evidence for its efficacy in the management of PONV as a single agent and in combination therapy.Expert opinionAprepitant is effective for PONV prophylaxis. It has superior antivomiting efficacy, long half-life, and favorable side effect profile. Data on antiemetic combinations involving aprepitant are limited, and it is not clear if the addition of other antiemetics to aprepitant results in improved PONV prophylaxis. The oral route of administration of aprepitant is a potential limitation in a busy clinical practice. However, the recent approval of an intravenous formulation could provide a more convenient route of administration. Aprepitant remains more expensive than other antiemetics, and there are no studies assessing the cost effectiveness of its use.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据