4.6 Article

Oxygen Vacancy-Rich Ultrathin Co3O4 Nanosheets as Nanofillers in Solid-Polymer Electrolyte for High-Performance Lithium Metal Batteries

期刊

CATALYSTS
卷 13, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/catal13040711

关键词

solid-polymer electrolyte; 2D nanosheets; lithium metal batteries; defect regulation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The development of high-performance solid-polymer electrolytes (SPEs) using two-dimensional inorganic nanofillers is crucial for the practical application of lithium metal batteries (LMBs). These nanofillers can interact with PEO to form a three-dimensional film with uniform Li+ distribution and vertical diffusion channels, resulting in improved conductivity and stability.
The development of high-performance solid-polymer electrolytes (SPEs) is a key to the practical application of lithium metal batteries (LMBs). The use of two-dimensional (2D) inorganic nanofiller is an efficient way to build poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO)-based SPEs with high ionic conductivity and stability. Herein, a series of 2D oxygen vacancy-rich Co3O4-y-x (x = 1, 2 and 3) with well-defined 2D nanostructures, a high surface area and controllable oxygen vacancy contents (Co3O4-y) was synthesized via a facile self-assembly method and NaBH4 reduction. When the 2D Co3O4-y-x (x = 1, 2 and 3) nanosheets are introduced as nanofillers in PEO-based SPEs, they can interact with the PEO to form a three-dimensional (3D) PEO/Co3O4-y film with uniform Li+ distribution and vertical diffusion channels, as well as strong adsorption of NO3- from LiNO3 electrolyte salt at the defective sites. As a result, the PEO/Co3O4-y-2 film reached a high ionic conductivity of 4.9 x 10(-5) S cm(-1), high Li+ a transference number of 0.51 and a wide electrochemical window over 4.6 V at 80 degrees C. The PEO/Co3O4-y-2 film enables the Li||PEO/Co3O4-y-2||LiFePO4 cell to deliver a high reversible capacity of 117.7 mAh g(-1) at 2 C and to maintain 126.7 mAh g(-1) at 1 C after 250 cycles with an initial capacity retention of 87.9%.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据