4.3 Article

Estimating prices for new aquaculture species: A hedonic pricing approach

期刊

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/13657305.2023.2186533

关键词

Australian aquaculture; fish characteristics; hedonic price model; sensory testing

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Assessing the potential economic and financial feasibility of a new aquaculture operation requires estimating the expected price of a species being considered for aquaculture, but which does not have a current market presence. In this study, a hedonic pricing model is developed using information on a wide range of other species currently traded in the market. The model includes characteristics such as product form and taste, and four different functional forms are applied to estimate the likely market price of the new species.
Assessing the potential economic and financial feasibility of a new aquaculture operation requires, amongst other things, an estimate of the price the product is expected to receive once produced. For new species, such prices may not be apparent in the market. In this study, we develop a hedonic pricing model to estimate the expected price of a species being considered for aquaculture, but which does not have a current market presence in Australia. The model includes information on a wide range of other species that are currently traded in the market, including low and high value species; farmed and wild caught, and domestically produced or imported. The characteristics of these species, including product form (e.g., whole, fillets, fresh, frozen, etc.) and taste characteristics (e.g., texture, moistness) are regressed against their price. Four different functional forms of the model are applied: log-linear, linear, semi-loglinear and the use of a Box-Cox transformation of the price variable. Sensory testing was undertaken to assess the characteristics of the new species, and the model was used to provide estimates of its likely market price if it is to be produced.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据