4.6 Review

A Critical Review of Studies on Coopetition in Educational Settings

期刊

SUSTAINABILITY
卷 15, 期 10, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/su15108370

关键词

coopetition; collaboration; competition; education

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The benefits and limitations of using collaborative and competitive activities for learning are well known, but a new approach called "coopetition" combines the strengths of both approaches to enhance student learning. However, there is limited research on coopetition in learning environments. This article reviews existing studies on coopetition and identifies three categories of research topics: organization of coopetition, medium and coopetition, and application of coopetition in education. The review provides implications for future educational research and practice.
The benefits and limitations of utilizing collaborative and competitive activities within and between groups to facilitate learning are well known. Typically, these two concepts are viewed as mutually exclusive approaches, where one is favored over the other in the classroom. However, utilizing an approach that takes advantage of the strengths of both while minimizing each one's weaknesses, could greatly enhance students' learning. This approach is called coopetition. Because of the dominance of collaboration and competition, the number of studies investigating coopetition in learning environments is rather limited. Therefore, this article reviews the extant studies using a coopetitive approach to provide a fuller understanding of this concept. Altogether, 33 articles were retrieved and analyzed using a grounded constant-comparative approach. As a result of the analysis, three categories of research topics emerged: (a) organization of coopetition, including zero-sum coopetition and social comparison coopetition, (b) medium and coopetition, including coopetition conducted in conventional face-to-face settings and computer-mediated settings, and (c) application of coopetition in education, which covers multiple areas such as cognitive, affective, and social domains, as well as educational management. The review discusses each category in detail, highlighting implications for future educational research and practice.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据