4.6 Article

Improved Biological Phosphorus Removal under Low Solid Retention Time Regime in Full-Scale Sequencing Batch Reactor

期刊

SUSTAINABILITY
卷 15, 期 10, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/su15107918

关键词

biological phosphorus removal; sequencing batch reactor; simultaneous nitrification-denitrification; solids retention times

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Enhanced biological phosphorus removal (EBPR) is a cost-effective technology to remove phosphorus from wastewater. A 80-day study showed that reducing solid retention time and lowering dissolved oxygen concentration can significantly enhance EBPR efficiency.
Enhanced biological phosphorus removal (EBPR) is an obscure but economical and helpful technology for removing phosphorus biologically from wastewater. A 3-MLD capacity pre-anoxic selector-attached sequencing batch reactor (SBR) treated municipal wastewater from the residents of IIT Roorkee. The treatment in the plant satisfied the effluent discharge standards in all respects except phosphorus, observed during an intensive two-year study. An elaborated 80-day study was performed to enhance and improve the plant's performance in terms of phosphorus removal specifically, with run 1: solid retention times (SRT) reduced from 56 to 20 days (t = 35 d), run 2: lowering the diffuser's running time from 15 min to 10 min in anoxic cum anaerobic selector chambers (dissolved oxygen (DO) concentration reduced to <0.15 mg/L) along with reducing SRT to 15 days (t = 25 d), and run 3:intensive reduction in SRT to <= 10 days (t = 20 d). During run 3, the increment in the enhanced biological phosphorus removal (EBPR) efficiency was three times that of the initial run ( eta(max)similar to 65%) with a readily biodegradable chemical oxygen demand to total phosphorus ratio (rbCOD/TP) of 7.8. The 16SrRNA sequencing revealed the microbial community structure before and after the changes in SRT and EBPR efficiencies, to correlate the biochemical processes and functional organisms.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据