4.6 Article

Identifying Chinese Tourists' Shopping Values and Their Consequences in the Context of a Duty-Free Shop: The Moderating Role of Country Image

期刊

SUSTAINABILITY
卷 15, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/su15065304

关键词

shopping value; country image; brand prestige; brand preference; well-being perception

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The objective of this study is to determine the role of Chinese tourists' shopping values in shaping their outcomes. Specifically, the study suggests that utilitarian and hedonic shopping values positively influence brand prestige, which further leads to higher well-being perceptions and brand preference. Additionally, well-being perceptions and brand preference have a positive impact on word-of-mouth. The study also explores the moderating role of country image in this model.
The objective of this study is to identify the role of Chinese tourists' shopping values in the formation of their outcome variables. This study more specifically proposes that two dimensions of shopping values, which include utilitarian and hedonic shopping values, positively affect brand prestige. In addition, it was hypothesized that brand prestige helps in regard to enhancing well-being perceptions and brand preference. It was also proposed that well-being perceptions and brand preference have a positive influence on word-of-mouth. This study also hypothesized the moderating role of country image in the proposed model. The survey responses were collected from 634 Chinese duty-free tourists. The data analysis results showed that both utilitarian and hedonic shopping values significantly affect brand prestige. Moreover, brand prestige was found to be a significant determinant of well-being perceptions, and well-being perceptions positively affect brand preference. Brand preference is a critical factor affecting word-of-mouth. Lastly, country image played a moderating role in the relationship between brand prestige and well-being perceptions and brand preference and word-of-mouth.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据