4.6 Article

3D Printing of Hybrid Cements Based on High Contents of Powders from Concrete, Ceramic and Brick Waste Chemically Activated with Sodium Sulphate (Na2SO4)

期刊

SUSTAINABILITY
卷 15, 期 13, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/su15139900

关键词

additive manufacturing; 3D printing; construction and demolition waste; sodium sulphate; alkali-activated materials; geopolymers

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article evaluates the synthesis, characterization, and 3D printing of hybrid cements using high contents of powders from concrete waste, ceramic waste, and red clay brick waste. The addition of ordinary Portland cement and a chemical activator improved the properties of the mixes. The optimized mixes allowed successful 3D printing of elements with good quality and sufficient strength.
This article evaluates the synthesis, characterization and 3D printing of hybrid cements based on high (70%) contents of powders from concrete waste (CoW), ceramic waste (CeW) and red clay brick waste (RCBW) from construction and demolition waste. For the synthesis of the hybrid cements, 30% (by weight) of ordinary Portland cement (OPC) was added. Sodium sulphate (Na2SO4) (4%) was used as a chemical activator. The effect of the liquid/solid ratio on the properties in the fresh state of the mixes was studied by means of minislump, flowability index, and buildability tests. The compressive strength was evaluated at 3, 7, 28 and 90 days of curing at room temperature (& AP;25 & DEG;C), obtaining strengths of up to 30.7 MPa (CoW), 37.0 MPa (CeW) and 33.2 MPa (RCBW) with an L/S ratio of 0.30. The results obtained allowed selecting the CoW 0.30, CeW 0.33 and RCBW 0.38 mixes as optimal for carrying out 3D printing tests on a laboratory scale, successfully printing elements with good print quality, adequate buildability, and compressive strength (CoW 0.30 = 18.2 MPa, CeW 0.33 = 27.7 MPa and RCBW 0.38 = 21.7 MPa) higher than the structural limit (& GE;17.5 MPa) established for concrete by Colombian Regulations for Earthquake Resistant Construction (NSR-10).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据