4.6 Article

Leaching Behaviour of Synthetic Leachate through a Sewage Sludge and Red Gypsum Composite as Intermediate Landfill Cover

期刊

SUSTAINABILITY
卷 15, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/su15054229

关键词

degree of compaction; intermediate landfill cover; hydraulic conductivity; leaching behaviour

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper investigates the environmental impact of using compacted sewage sludge:red gypsum (SS:RG) mixture as intermediate landfill cover. Column tests are performed to percolate synthetic leachate through samples with various degrees of compaction. The results show that hydraulic conductivity decreases in three stages, with the first stage attributed to particle rearrangement and hydration of calcium silicate hydrate (CSH). A minimum of 75% compaction is recommended for favorable porosity, hydraulic conductivity, and leachate quality.
This paper examines the environmental impact of the use of compacted sewage sludge:red gypsum (SS:RG) mixture as intermediate landfill cover in terms of yield and quality of leachate as characterised by hydraulic conductivity and leaching behaviour. A series of column tests using the constant head method is carried out by percolating the synthetic leachate through samples that have been compacted at various degrees (60, 70, 75, 80 and 85%). The leachate quality is monitored at pre-determined days for pH, COD, Cu, Fe and Zn. In general, hydraulic conductivity decreases in three stages, in which the first stage is mainly attributed to the particle rearrangement and hydration of calcium silicate hydrate (CSH). The hydration of CSH increases the pH, which causes the heavy metal to precipitate and be entrapped within the matrices of CSH gel, thereby further reducing the porosity and hydraulic conductivity. A minimum of 75% compaction has shown favourable final porosity, hydraulic conductivity, and leachate quality, although a minimum of 80% compaction is recommended in order to achieve a satisfactory compressive strength of greater than 345 kPa for a landfill operation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据