4.8 Review

Near-infrared absorbing glazing for energy-efficient windows: A critical review and performance assessments from the building requirements

期刊

NANO ENERGY
卷 110, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2023.108334

关键词

Spectrally selective windows; Architectural glazing; Energy saving; Metallic ions; Nanoparticles

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In the past decades, spectrally selective windows have been widely studied and developed for building energy-saving purposes. This review focuses on ion-based and nanoparticle-based NIR absorbing glazings, discussing their spectral selectivity mechanisms, application status, and comparative evaluation of their performance. The challenges and future directions for bridging the gap between lab research and large-scale practical applications are also discussed.
In the past decades, spectrally selective windows, such near-infrared absorbing (NIR) glazings, low-e glazings, and various smart windows, have been widely studied, developed, and applied in different climatic conditions for building energy-saving purposes. One major pathway of the spectrally selective glazings to achieve energy savings is through solar radiation control, either by NIR reflection or absorption. This review concerns the NIR absorbing glazings with the limited subset of ion-based and nanoparticle-based glazings. In detail, each cat-egory's spectral absorbing materials are further distinguished into sub-categories, and then their underlying mechanisms of spectral selectivity were elaborated, as well as their application status in terms of manufacturing, cost, and commercialization popularity. To further advise the application in the building sector, we compara-tively evaluated the performance of each kind of glazing in terms of the light and heat decoupling ability and visual qualities (i.e., color rendering). Finally, the challenges and future directions of the NIR absorbing glazings to bridge the gap between lab research and large-scale practical applications are illustrated.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据