4.8 Article

Conformal coating of CdS onto flexible enokitake-like standing gold nanowire arrays for omnidirectional low-light-intensity photocatalysis

期刊

NANO ENERGY
卷 108, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2023.108227

关键词

Gold nanowires; CdS; Flexible photocatalysis; Low-intensity sunlight irradiation; Omnidirectional

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Researchers have developed flexible artificial leaves that can perform model chemical reactions under omnidirectional light illumination and low light intensity conditions. The leaves consist of elastomer-bonded, CdS-coated, enokitake-like gold nanowire arrays, which offer high surface area and efficient light absorption. This photocatalytic system mimics the features of natural biosystems and shows promising potential for various applications.
Nature's photocatalysis system is typically flexible and can function with omnidirectional sunlight illumination (e.g. plant leaves), sometimes even under low-intensity sunlight conditions (e.g. seagrass). Previous research efforts have been mainly directed at designing photocatalysts in solutions or on rigid substrates with the aim of achieving high efficiency rather than mimicking the features of ubiquitous natural biosystems. Here we report on flexible artificial leaves by using elastomer-bonded, CdS-coated, enokitake-like gold nanowire (AuNW) arrays, which can perform model chemical reactions under omnidirectional light illumination and at a low light in-tensity of-1.2 mW/cm2 - about 1% of the sunlight energy at the sea surface level, which corresponds to the disphotic zone in the sea. The key attributes of our photocatalytic system include: (1) closely-packed, vertically aligned AuNWs offering high surface area and efficient light absorption; (2) the conformal and tunable depo-sition of CdS onto AuNWs enabling optimization of photocatalytic efficiency; (3) free-standing and flexible features allowing for a versatile design that mimics Nature's photocatalytic process.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据