4.6 Article

Modeling and Simulation Investigation of Ferroelectric-Based Electrostatic Doping for Tunnelling Field-Effect Transistor

期刊

MICROMACHINES
卷 14, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/mi14030672

关键词

ferroelectricity; electrostatic doping; tunneling field-effect transistor; TCAD; polarity gate

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this paper, a novel ferroelectric-based electrostatic doping (Fe-ED) nanosheet tunneling field-effect transistor (TFET) is proposed, which induces electrons and holes in an intrinsic silicon film by inserting a ferroelectric film into the polarity gate to create the p-source and n-drain regions. The device performance is independent of the chemical doping profile, eliminating issues related to abrupt junctions, dopant variability, and solid solubility. Simulation results show an improved ON-state current and I-ON/I-OFF ratio, with a significant increase in the on-state current of Fe-ED NSTFET. The study suggests that Fe-ED can be an effective doping strategy for versatile reconfigurable nanoscale transistors and highly integrated circuits.
In this paper, a novel ferroelectric-based electrostatic doping (Fe-ED) nanosheet tunneling field-effect transistor (TFET) is proposed and analyzed using technology computer-aided design (TCAD) Sentaurus simulation software. By inserting a ferroelectric film into the polarity gate, the electrons and holes are induced in an intrinsic silicon film to create the p-source and the n-drain regions, respectively. Device performance is largely independent of the chemical doping profile, potentially freeing it from issues related to abrupt junctions, dopant variability, and solid solubility. An improved ON-state current and I-ON/I-OFF ratio have been demonstrated in a 3D-calibrated simulation, and the Fe-ED NSTFET's on-state current has increased significantly. According to our study, Fe-ED can be used in versatile reconfigurable nanoscale transistors as well as highly integrated circuits as an effective doping strategy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据