4.6 Article

Laser Powder Bed Fusion of 316L Stainless Steel: Effect of Laser Polishing on the Surface Morphology and Corrosion Behavior

期刊

MICROMACHINES
卷 14, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/mi14040850

关键词

selective laser melting; laser polishing; 316L stainless steel; surface morphology; electrochemical corrosion

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, the effect of laser pulse width on the surface morphology and corrosion resistance of LPBF-ed 316L stainless steel samples after laser polishing was investigated. The experimental results show that continuous wave (CW) laser polishing results in significant improvement in roughness and the best corrosion resistance. Nanosecond (NS) laser polishing leads to microcracks and decreased microhardness and corrosion resistance. Femtosecond (FS) laser polishing does not significantly improve roughness and results in decreased corrosion resistance due to ultrafast laser-induced micro-nanostructures increasing the contact area of the electrochemical reaction.
Recently, laser polishing, as an effective post-treatment technology for metal parts fabricated by laser powder bed fusion (LPBF), has received much attention. In this paper, LPBF-ed 316L stainless steel samples were polished by three different types of lasers. The effect of laser pulse width on surface morphology and corrosion resistance was investigated. The experimental results show that, compared to the nanosecond (NS) and femtosecond (FS) lasers, the surface material's sufficient remelting realized by the continuous wave (CW) laser results in a significant improvement in roughness. The surface hardness is increased and the corrosion resistance is the best. The microcracks on the NS laser-polished surface lead to a decrease in the microhardness and corrosion resistance. The FS laser does not significantly improve surface roughness. The ultrafast laser-induced micro-nanostructures increase the contact area of the electrochemical reaction, resulting in a decrease in corrosion resistance.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据