4.4 Review

Development of a Skin-Directed Scoring System for Stevens-Johnson Syndrome and Epidermal Necrolysis: A Delphi Consensus Exercise

期刊

JAMA DERMATOLOGY
卷 159, 期 7, 页码 772-777

出版社

AMER MEDICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2023.1347

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article discusses the importance of developing a skin-directed scoring system for EN, including consistent terminology and morphologic traits, as well as identifying the most affected sites. Through a Delphi consensus exercise, it was determined that there is a need for a skin-directed scoring system for EN.
ImportanceScoring systems for Stevens-Johnson syndrome and epidermal necrolysis (EN) only estimate patient prognosis and are weighted toward comorbidities and systemic features; morphologic terminology for EN lesions is inconsistent. ObjectivesTo establish consensus among expert dermatologists on EN terminology, morphologic progression, and most-affected sites, and to build a framework for developing a skin-directed scoring system for EN. Evidence ReviewA Delphi consensus using the RAND/UCLA appropriateness criteria was initiated with a core group from the Society of Dermatology Hospitalists to establish agreement on the optimal design for an EN cutaneous scoring instrument, terminology, morphologic traits, and sites of involvement. FindingsIn round 1, the 54 participating dermatology hospitalists reached consensus on all 49 statements (30 appropriate, 3 inappropriate, 16 uncertain). In round 2, they agreed on another 15 statements (8 appropriate, 7 uncertain). There was consistent agreement on the need for a skin-specific instrument; on the most-often affected skin sites (head and neck, chest, upper back, ocular mucosa, oral mucosa); and that blanching erythema, dusky erythema, targetoid erythema, vesicles/bullae, desquamation, and erosions comprise the morphologic traits of EN and can be consistently differentiated. Conclusions and RelevanceThis consensus exercise confirmed the need for an EN skin-directed scoring system, nomenclature, and differentiation of specific morphologic traits, and identified the sites most affected. It also established a baseline consensus for a standardized EN instrument with consistent terminology. Key PointsQuestionIs there a need for an EN skin-directed scoring system, consistent EN terminology, a better understanding of orphologic progression, and/or identification of the most-affected sites? FindingsThis Delphi consensus exercise determined that there is a need for a skin-directed scoring system for EN with consensus achieved regarding terminology, morphologic traits, and most-affected locations of involvement. MeaningThe findings of this consensus exercise may be used as a framework for developing a skin-directed EN grading tool with the goal of precisely monitoring disease severity and changes during hospitalization. This Delphi consensus exercise with more than 50 dermatology experts explores the need for a skin-directed epidermal necrolysis assessment tool that incorporates disease morphologic traits, terminology, and sites of involvement.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据