4.4 Article

Revisiting puffy dark matter with novel insights: partial wave analysis

期刊

JOURNAL OF HIGH ENERGY PHYSICS
卷 -, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/JHEP06(2023)103

关键词

Cosmology of Theories BSM; Particle Nature of Dark Matter

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We conducted a comprehensive study on the self-interaction cross-section of puffy dark matter particles, taking into account the significant intrinsic size of these particles. Our study highlights the importance of the Yukawa potential and partial wave analysis in understanding this cross-section in the resonant and classical regimes. We found that the finite-size effect of puffy dark matter particles enlarges the Born-effective regime, and the three regimes for the self-interaction cross-section can differ significantly from point-like dark matter, depending on the ratio between the particle radius and the force range.
We present a comprehensive study on the self-interaction cross-section of puffy dark matter (DM) particles, which have a significant intrinsic size compared to their Compton wavelength. For such puffy DM self-interaction cross-section in the resonant and classical regimes, our study demonstrates the significance of the Yukawa potential and the necessity of partial wave analysis: (i) Due to the finite-size effect of puffy DM particles, the new Yukawa potential of puffy DM is found to enlarge the Born-effective regime for the self-interaction cross-section, compared with the point-like DM; (ii) Our partial wave analysis shows that depending on the value of the ratio between R-chi (radius of a puffy DM particle) and 1/m(phi) (force range), the three regimes (Born-effective, resonant and classical) for puffy DM self-interaction cross-section can be very different from the point-like DM; (iii) We find that to solve the small-scale anomalies via self-interacting puffy DM, the Born-effective and the resonant regimes exist for dwarf galaxies, while for the cluster and Milky Way galaxy the non-Born regime is necessary.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据