4.4 Article

EFT analysis of New Physics at COHERENT

期刊

JOURNAL OF HIGH ENERGY PHYSICS
卷 -, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/JHEP05(2023)074

关键词

Non-Standard Neutrino Properties; Specific BSM Phenomenology; Neutrino Interactions; SMEFT

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Using an effective field theory approach, this study investigates coherent neutrino scattering on nuclei relevant to the COHERENT experiment. Non-standard effects in both neutrino production and detection are considered, with an arbitrary flavor structure and all leading Wilson coefficients simultaneously present. A concise description of the COHERENT event rate is obtained by introducing three generalized weak charges. The results have implications for specific new physics scenarios and highlight the importance of including COHERENT data in electroweak precision studies.
Using an effective field theory approach, we study coherent neutrino scattering on nuclei, in the setup pertinent to the COHERENT experiment. We include non-standard effects both in neutrino production and detection, with an arbitrary flavor structure, with all leading Wilson coefficients simultaneously present, and without assuming factorization in flux times cross section. A concise description of the COHERENT event rate is obtained by introducing three generalized weak charges, which can be associated (in a certain sense) to the production and scattering of nu(e), nu(mu) and (nu) over bar (mu) on the nuclear target. Our results are presented in a convenient form that can be trivially applied to specific New Physics scenarios. In particular, we find that existing COHERENT measurements provide percent level constraints on two combinations of Wilson coefficients. These constraints have a visible impact on the global SMEFT fit, even in the constrained flavor-blind setup. The improvement, which affects certain 4-fermion LLQQ operators, is significantly more important in a flavor-general SMEFT. Our work shows that COHERENT data should be included in electroweak precision studies from now on.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据