4.4 Article

Recurrence relation for instanton partition function in SU(N) gauge theory

期刊

JOURNAL OF HIGH ENERGY PHYSICS
卷 -, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/JHEP03(2023)220

关键词

Supersymmetric Gauge Theory; Topological Field Theories; Differential and Algebraic Geometry; Gauge Symmetry

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We derive a residue formula and recurrence relation for the instanton partition function in N = 2 supersymmetric theory on C-2 with SU(N) gauge group. The recurrence relation is known for SU(2) gauge group and a residue formula is found for the term with the minimal number of instantons in the SU(3) case. We provide a complete proof of the residue formula in all instanton orders and formulate a refined version of it based on an algebro-geometric interpretation.
We derive a residue formula and as a consequence a recurrence relation for the instanton partition function in N = 2 supersymmetric theory on C-2 with SU(N) gauge group.The particular cases of SU(2) and SU(3) gauge groups were considered in the literature before. The recurrence relation with SU(2) gauge group is long well known and was found as the Alday-Gaiotto-Tachikawa (AGT) counterpart of the Zamolodchikov relation for the Virasoro conformal blocks. In the SU(3) case a residue formula for the term with the mini-mal number of instantons was found and basing on it a recurrence relation was conjectured.We give a complete proof of the residue formula in all instanton orders in presence of any number of matter hypermultiplets in the adjoint and fundamental representations. The recurrence relation however describes only theories with not too much matter hyper-multiplets so that the behaviour at infinity is moderate. The guideline of the proof is an algebro-geometric interpretation of the N = 2 supersymmetric gauge theory partition func-tion in terms of the framed torsion-free sheaves. Lead by this interpretation we formulate a refined version of the residue formula and prove it by direct algebraic manipulations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据