4.6 Article

Zn-doped nickel iron (oxy)hydroxide nanocubes passivated by polyanions with high catalytic activity and corrosion resistance for seawater oxidation

期刊

JOURNAL OF ENERGY CHEMISTRY
卷 81, 期 -, 页码 82-92

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jechem.2023.02.033

关键词

Seawater splitting; Oxygen evolution reaction; Electrocatalyst; Layered double hydroxide; Sulfidation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Electrochemical water splitting for hydrogen production is a promising renewable energy-conversion technique. However, large-scale freshwater electrolysis may deplete water resources and cause water scarcity. Therefore, seawater electrolysis is considered as a potential solution for the future energy and water crisis. In this study, zinc-doped nickel iron (oxy)hydroxide nanocubes passivated by negatively charged polyanions (NFZ-PBA-S) have been developed as an effective electrocatalyst for seawater oxidation, with outstanding catalytic activity, stability, and selectivity.
Electrochemical water splitting to produce hydrogen fuel is a promising renewable energy-conversion technique. Large-scale electrolysis of freshwater may deplete water resources and cause water scarcity worldwide. Thus, seawater electrolysis is a potential solution to the future energy and water crisis. In sea-water electrolysis, it is critical to develop cost-effective electrocatalysts to split seawater without chloride corrosion. Herein, we present zinc-doped nickel iron (oxy)hydroxide nanocubes passivated by negatively charged polyanions (NFZ-PBA-S) that exhibits outstanding catalytic activity, stability, and selectivity for seawater oxidation. Zn dopants and polyanion-rich passivated surface layers in NFZ-PBA-S could effec-tively repel chlorine ions and enhance corrosion resistance, enabling its excellent catalytic activity and stability for seawater oxidation.(c) 2023 Science Press and Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences. Published by ELSEVIER B.V. and Science Press. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据