4.7 Article

Impact of Facial Landmark Localization on Facial Expression Recognition

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AFFECTIVE COMPUTING
卷 14, 期 2, 页码 1267-1279

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TAFFC.2021.3124142

关键词

Frequency locked loops; Face recognition; Head; Faces; Three-dimensional displays; Location awareness; Strain; Facial landmark localization; face registration; facial expression recognition

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this paper, the impact of facial landmark localization (FLL) approaches on facial expression recognition (FER) tasks is studied. Due to the limitations of existing FLL datasets in measuring performance under different difficulties, the performance of recent approaches is quantified under variations in head pose and facial expressions. The study shows that optimizing the euclidean distance for landmark accuracy does not necessarily improve FER performance. To address this issue, a new evaluation metric for FLL that is more relevant to FER is proposed.
Although facial landmark localization (FLL) approaches are becoming increasingly accurate in identifying facial components, one question remains unanswered: what is the impact of these approaches on subsequent, related tasks? In this paper, we focus on facial expression recognition (FER), where facial landmarks are used for face registration, which is a common usage. Since the common datasets for facial landmark localization do not allow for a proper measurement of performance according to the different difficulties (e.g., pose, expression, illumination, occlusion, motion blur), we also quantify the performance of recent approaches in the presence of head pose variations and facial expressions. Finally, we conduct a study of the impact of these approaches on FER. We show that the landmark accuracy achieved so far by optimizing the euclidean distance does not necessarily guarantee a gain in performance for FER. To deal with this issue, we propose a new evaluation metric for FLL that is more relevant to FER.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据