4.6 Article

Computerized Diagnosis of Liver Tumors From CT Scans Using a Deep Neural Network Approach

期刊

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/JBHI.2023.3248489

关键词

Bioinformatics; Liver tumor; deep learning; computed tomography; computer-aided diagnosis; Inception v3

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The liver is a common site for various types of tumors. This study demonstrates the feasibility of using a deep learning approach to automatically classify liver tumors from CT scans and extract features not visible to the naked eye. The proposed computer-assisted system serves as a novel non-invasive diagnostic tool for objectively classifying the most common liver tumors.
The liver is a frequent site of benign and malignant, primary and metastatic tumors. Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) are the most common primary liver cancers, and colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM) is the most common secondary liver cancer. Although the imaging characteristic of these tumors is central to optimal clinical management, it relies on imaging features that are often non-specific, overlap, and are subject to inter-observer variability. Thus, in this study, we aimed to categorize liver tumors automatically from CT scans using a deep learning approach that objectively extracts discriminating features not visible to the naked eye. Specifically, we used a modified Inception v3 network-based classification model to classify HCC, ICC, CRLM, and benign tumors from pretreatment portal venous phase computed tomography (CT) scans. Using a multi-institutional dataset of 814 patients, this method achieved an overall accuracy rate of 96%, with sensitivity rates of 96%, 94%, 99%, and 86% for HCC, ICC, CRLM, and benign tumors, respectively, using an independent dataset. These results demonstrate the feasibility of the proposed computer-assisted system as a novel non-invasive diagnostic tool to classify the most common liver tumors objectively.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据