4.7 Article

Involvement of CBF in the fine-tuning of litchi flowering time and cold and drought stresses

期刊

FRONTIERS IN PLANT SCIENCE
卷 14, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1167458

关键词

litchi; flower; cold; CBF; MFT

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Litchi is an economically important fruit tree in southern China and is widely cultivated in subtropical regions. In this study, the researchers identified LcCBF2 and LcCBF3 as upstream activators of LcMFT, and proposed their contribution to the fine-tuning of flowering time. Ectopic overexpression of LcCBF2 and LcCBF3 in Arabidopsis resulted in delayed flowering and increased freezing and drought tolerance.
Litchi (Litchi chinensis) is an economically important fruit tree in southern China and is widely cultivated in subtropical regions. However, irregular flowering attributed to inadequate floral induction leads to a seriously fluctuating bearing. Litchi floral initiation is largely determined by cold temperatures, whereas the underlying molecular mechanisms have yet to be identified. In this study, we identified four CRT/DRE BINDING FACTORS (CBF) homologs in litchi, of which LcCBF1, LcCBF2 and LcCBF3 showed a decrease in response to the floral inductive cold. A similar expression pattern was observed for the MOTHER OF FT AND TFL1 homolog (LcMFT) in litchi. Furthermore, both LcCBF2 and LcCBF3 were found to bind to the promoter of LcMFT to activate its expression, as indicated by the analysis of yeast-one-hybrid (Y1H), electrophoretic mobility shift assays (EMSA), and dual luciferase complementation assays. Ectopic overexpression of LcCBF2 and LcCBF3 in Arabidopsis caused delayed flowering and increased freezing and drought tolerance, whereas overexpression of LcMFT in Arabidopsis had no significant effect on flowering time. Taken together, we identified LcCBF2 and LcCBF3 as upstream activators of LcMFT and proposed the contribution of the cold-responsive CBF to the fine-tuning of flowering time.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据