4.6 Article

Four new suomilides isolated from the cyanobacterium Nostoc sp. KVJ20 and proposal of their biosynthetic origin

期刊

FRONTIERS IN MICROBIOLOGY
卷 14, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1130018

关键词

Nostoc; cyanobacteria; natural products; protease inhibitor; biosynthesis; secondary metabolites; aeruginosin; suomilide

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The suomilide and banyasides are non-ribosomal peptides produced by cyanobacteria, with highly modified structures and functionalities. Four suomilides, named suomilide B - E, were isolated and their structures determined. These compounds have different glycosyl group functionalization compared to suomilide A. However, no significant anti-proliferative, anti-biofilm, or anti-bacterial activities were found. Genomic sequencing allowed the proposal of a biosynthetic gene cluster for suomilides, indicating the prephenate-derived azabicyclononane core is most likely incorporated by a proline specific non-ribosomal peptide synthetase-unit.
The suomilide and the banyasides are highly modified and functionalized non-ribosomal peptides produced by cyanobacteria of the order Nostocales. These compound classes share several substructures, including a complex azabicyclononane core, which was previously assumed to be derived from the amino acid tyrosine. In our study we were able to isolate and determine the structures of four suomilides, named suomilide B - E (1-4). The compounds differ from the previously isolated suomilide A by the functionalization of the glycosyl group. Compounds 1-4 were assayed for anti-proliferative, anti-biofilm and anti-bacterial activities, but no significant activity was detected. The sequenced genome of the producer organism Nostoc sp. KVJ20 enabled us to propose a biosynthetic gene cluster for suomilides. Our findings indicated that the azabicyclononane core of the suomilides is derived from prephenate and is most likely incorporated by a proline specific non-ribosomal peptide synthetase-unit.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据