4.6 Article

Eugenol eliminates carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae via reactive oxygen species mechanism

期刊

FRONTIERS IN MICROBIOLOGY
卷 14, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1090787

关键词

eugenol; carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae; reactive oxygen species; antibacteria; biofilm

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study investigates the antibacterial activity of eugenol (EG) on carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP) and the underlying mechanisms. It is found that EG exhibits dose-dependent inhibitory effects on CRKP by inducing reactive oxygen species (ROS) and reducing glutathione, leading to membrane rupture and leakage of bacterial cytoplasmic components. Moreover, EG can also disrupt the integrity of bacterial biofilm.
Multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacterial infections have gained increasing attention due to the high incidence rates and high mortality, especially for the carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP) infection that can cause severe complications (e.g., pneumonia and sepsis) in multiple organs. Therefore, the development of new antibacterial agents against CRKP is imperative. Inspired by natural plant antibacterial agents with broad-spectrum antibacterial properties, the antibacterial/biofilm activity of eugenol (EG) on CRKP and their underlying mechanisms are investigated in our work. It is found that EG exhibits remarkable inhibitory effects on planktonic CRKP in a dose-dependent fashion. Meanwhile, the destruction of membrane integrity induced by the formation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and glutathione reduction results in the leakage of bacterial cytoplasmic components, including DNA, beta-galactosidase, and protein. Moreover, when EG contacts with bacterial biofilm, the whole thickness of the dense biofilm matrix decreases, and the integrity is destroyed. Overall, this work verified that EG could eliminate CRKP via ROS-induced membrane rupture, which offers vital evidence to explain the antibacterial ability of EG against CRKP.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据