4.7 Review

Hematopoietic stem cells and betaherpesvirus latency

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fcimb.2023.1189805

关键词

latency; betaherpesvirus; HCMV; HHV-5; HHV-6; HHV-7; hematopoiesis; hematopoietic stem; progenitor cell

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Human betaherpesviruses, including HCMV, HHV-6a, HHV-6b, and HHV-7, infect and establish latency in CD34+ HPCs. The interactions between these viruses and host HPCs regulate viral lifecycle and latency. Precise manipulation of host and viral factors contribute to viral genome maintenance, increased host cell survival, and manipulation of the cellular environment. This review highlights the complexities of betaherpesvirus latency and HPC virus-host interactions.
The human betaherpesviruses including human cytomegalovirus (HCMV), human herpesvirus (HHV)-6a and HHV-6b, and HHV-7 infect and establish latency in CD34+ hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HPCs). The diverse repertoire of HPCs in humans and the complex interactions between these viruses and host HPCs regulate the viral lifecycle, including latency. Precise manipulation of host and viral factors contribute to preferential maintenance of the viral genome, increased host cell survival, and specific manipulation of the cellular environment including suppression of neighboring cells and immune control. The dynamic control of these processes by the virus regulate inter- and intra-host signals critical to the establishment of chronic infection. Regulation occurs through direct viral protein interactions and cellular signaling, miRNA regulation, and viral mimics of cellular receptors and ligands, all leading to control of cell proliferation, survival, and differentiation. Hematopoietic stem cells have unique biological properties and the tandem control of virus and host make this a unique environment for chronic herpesvirus infection in the bone marrow. This review highlights the elegant complexities of the betaherpesvirus latency and HPC virus-host interactions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据