4.8 Article

Enhanced functional detection of synaptic calcium-permeable AMPA receptors using intracellular NASPM

期刊

ELIFE
卷 12, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

eLIFE SCIENCES PUBL LTD
DOI: 10.7554/eLife.66765

关键词

AMPA-type glutamate receptor; excitatory postsynaptic current; TARP; spermine; NASPM; rectification; Mouse

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Calcium-permeable AMPA-type glutamate receptors (CP-AMPARs) play important roles in synaptic plasticity and pathology. The presence of auxiliary subunits complicates the interpretation of current rectification as a measure of CP-AMPAR expression. However, the inclusion of the spider toxin analog 1-naphthylacetyl spermine (NASPM) in the intracellular solution can block GluA1-mediated outward currents regardless of the auxiliary subunit type, providing a functional measure of CP-AMPARs.
Calcium-permeable AMPA-type glutamate receptors (CP-AMPARs) contribute to many forms of synaptic plasticity and pathology. They can be distinguished from GluA2-containing calcium-impermeable AMPARs by the inward rectification of their currents, which reflects voltage-dependent channel block by intracellular spermine. However, the efficacy of this weakly permeant blocker is differentially altered by the presence of AMPAR auxiliary subunits - including transmembrane AMPAR regulatory proteins, cornichons, and GSG1L - which are widely expressed in neurons and glia. This complicates the interpretation of rectification as a measure of CP-AMPAR expression. Here, we show that the inclusion of the spider toxin analog 1-naphthylacetyl spermine (NASPM) in the intracellular solution results in a complete block of GluA1-mediated outward currents irrespective of the type of associated auxiliary subunit. In neurons from GluA2-knockout mice expressing only CP-AMPARs, intracellular NASPM, unlike spermine, completely blocks outward synaptic currents. Thus, our results identify a functional measure of CP-AMPARs, that is unaffected by their auxiliary subunit content.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据