4.4 Article

Antibody-Functionalized Copper Oxide Nanoparticles with Targeted Antibacterial Activity

期刊

CHEMISTRYOPEN
卷 12, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/open.202200241

关键词

antibody bioconjugate; antibiotic; copper oxide nanoparticle; gram selectivity

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Copper oxide nanoparticles were functionalized with specific antibodies to enhance their antibacterial activity against Gram-positive or Gram-negative bacteria. The functionalized nanoparticles showed increased specificity of their antibacterial activity, as evidenced by the reduced IC50 and MI values in both Escherichia coli and Bacillus subtilis. The advantages of smart antibiotic nanoparticles are discussed.
Copper oxide nanoparticles (CuO-NPs) were functionalized with specific antibodies to target their antibacterial activity against Gram-positive or Gram-negative bacteria. The CuO-NPs were covalently functionalized to cover their surface with specific antibodies. The differently prepared CuO-NPs were characterized by X-ray diffraction, transmission electron microscopy and dynamic light scattering. The antibacterial activities of the unmodified CuO-NPs and the antibody-functionalized nanoparticles (CuO-NP-AbGram(-) and CuO-NP-AbGram(+)) were determined for both Gram-negative Escherichia coli and Gram-positive Bacillus subtilis bacteria. The antibody-functionalized NPs showed a differential increase of their antibacterial activity according to the specific antibody. The CuO-NP-AbGram(-) in E. coli showed reduced half maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) and minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values when compared with unfunctionalized CuO-NPs. On the other hand, the CuO-NP-AbGram(+) also showed reduced IC50 and MIC values in B. subtilis, when compared with non-functionalized CuO-NPs. Thus, the functionalized CuO nanoparticles with specific antibodies showed enhanced specificity of their antibacterial activity. The advantages of smart antibiotic nanoparticles are discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据