4.4 Article

Thiourea-Derived Single-Source Molecular Precursor For Spin-Coated PbS Thin Films

期刊

CHEMISTRYOPEN
卷 12, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/open.202300045

关键词

crystal structure; molecular precursor; semiconductors; thin films; spin coating

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, a suitable single-source precursor for the deposition of nanostructured PbS thin films at moderate temperatures under ambient conditions was sought. The ligand N-(thiomorpholine-4-carbothioyl)benzamide and its corresponding lead(II) complex were synthesized and their structures were determined. The lead complex showed promising thermal decomposition behavior, leading to the successful fabrication of phase-pure PbS thin films at a comparably low annealing temperature of 250 degrees C. The resulting films exhibited nanoparticles with cuboidal morphology and blue-shifted optical absorption.
In search of a suitable single-source precursor for the deposition of nanostructured PbS thin films at moderate temperatures under ambient conditions, we have synthesized the ligand N-(thiomorpholine-4-carbothioyl)benzamide and its corresponding lead(II) complex. The structures of both compounds were determined by single-crystal X-ray diffraction. In the complex, two ligands coordinate to a lead(II) atom in hemi-directed geometry through S and O atoms. Secondary intermolecular Pb center dot center dot center dot S interactions group the complexes into pairs. As bulk powders, both the ligand and complex show nominal composition and purity as evidenced by elemental analysis, H-1 NMR and IR spectroscopy. Thermal analysis of the lead(II) complex was carried out to understand its thermal decomposition behaviour for establishing a thin film fabrication protocol. Thin films of phase-pure PbS were fabricated using this new molecular precursor at the comparatively low annealing temperature of 250 degrees C. The film showed nanoparticles with cuboidal morphology and a blue-shifted optical absorption.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据