4.5 Article

Filtration Kinetics of Depth Filters-Modeling and Comparison with Tomographic Data of Particle Depositions

期刊

ATMOSPHERE
卷 14, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/atmos14040640

关键词

filtration; tomography; simulation; microstructure; filtration kinetics

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Depth filtration is a widespread technique used in separating airborne particles. Simulations are crucial to optimize the filter structure and develop filter materials with high efficiency and low pressure differences. A one-dimensional model combined with microstructural data of filter materials is presented in this work, enabling more realistic modeling of the filtration process.
Depth filtration is a widespread technique for the separation of airborne particles. The evolution of the pressure difference within this process is determined to a significant extent by the filter structure. Simulations are an important tool for optimizing the filter structure, allowing the development of filter materials having high filtration efficiencies and low pressure differences. Because of the large number of physical phenomena and the complex structure of filter materials, simulations of the filtration kinetics are, however, challenging. In this context, one-dimensional models are advantageous for the calculation of the filtration kinetics of depth filters, due to their low computation requirements. In this work, an approach for combining a one-dimensional model with microstructural data of filter materials is presented. This enables more realistic modeling of the filtration process. Calculations were performed on a macroscopic as well as microscopic level and compared to experimental data. With the suggested approach, the influence of a measured microstructure on the results was examined and predictability was improved. Especially for small research departments and for the development of optimized filter materials adapted to specific separation tasks, this approach provides a valuable tool.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据