4.7 Article

IR-Live: fabrication of a low-cost plastic microfluidic device for infrared spectromicroscopy of living cells

期刊

LAB ON A CHIP
卷 16, 期 9, 页码 1644-1651

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c5lc01460c

关键词

-

资金

  1. Mechanobiology Institute (MBI), National University of Singapore
  2. US Department of Energy, Office of Science, and Office of Biological and Environmental Research
  3. Director, Office of Science, and Office of Basic Energy Sciences
  4. [DE-AC02-225 05CH11231]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Water is a strong mid-infrared absorber, which has hindered the full exploitation of label-free and noninvasive infrared (IR) spectromicroscopy techniques for the study of living biological samples. To overcome this barrier, many researchers have built sophisticated fluidic chambers or microfluidic chips wherein the depth of the liquid medium in the sample compartment is limited to 10 mu m or less. Here we report an innovative and simple way to fabricate plastic devices with infrared transparent view-ports enabling infrared spectromicroscopy of living biological samples; therefore the device is named IR-Live. Advantages of this approach include lower production costs, a minimal need to access a micro-fabrication facility, and unlimited mass or waste exchange for the living samples surrounding the view-port area. We demonstrate that the low-cost IR-Live in combination with microfluidic perfusion techniques enables long term (>60 h) cell culture, which broadens the capability of IR spectromicroscopy for studying living biological samples. To illustrate this, we first applied the device to study protein and lipid polarity in migrating REF52 fibroblasts by collecting 2-dimensional spectral chemical maps at a micrometer spatial resolution. Then, we demonstrated the suitability of our approach to study dynamic cellular events by collecting a time series of spectral maps of U937 monocytes during the early stage of cell attachment to a bio-compatible surface.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据