4.6 Article

Sunlight Assisted Photocatalytic Valorization of Lignin Using Recyclable Light Harvesters

期刊

ACS SUSTAINABLE CHEMISTRY & ENGINEERING
卷 11, 期 12, 页码 4568-4579

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.2c05917

关键词

agri-biomass; lignin degradation; light-harvesting; porphyrins; recyclability; solar photocatalysis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A solar photocatalytic system based on porphyrin has been developed to directly depolymerize lignin and lignin-model compounds. The system's mechanism for lignin breakdown has been investigated and the catalyst's recovery and recyclability have been evaluated.
The abundant aromatic supply lignin, which is generated from agri-biomass, can be used as a sustainable alternative for several platform chemicals and fuels. The strongly cross-linked and randomly polymerized structure of lignin makes it difficult to valorize. In the current work, we have developed a solar photocatalytic system based on porphyrin that can directly depolymerize lignin and lignin-model compounds. The porphyrin has been evaluated for photophysical characteristics such as singlet oxygen and fluorescence quantum yields. The developed catalyst has been initially utilized for the degradation of lignin model compounds and then directly on lignin. For assessment, the degraded lignin various characterization techniques such as UV-vis spectroscopy, heteronuclear single quantum coherence spectroscopy (HSQC), electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR), mass spectroscopy, and gel permeation chromatography (GPC) were used. Later, a plausible mechanism for the breakdown of lignin/lignin model compounds was inferred after the developed photocatalytic system was investigated under a variety of experimental conditions. The photocatalyst's recovery and recyclability were further evaluated. This solar-assisted photocatalytic valorization of lignin driven by the light harvesters is a smart and sustainable initiative to synergize agri-waste removal and platform chemical generation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据