4.7 Article

Effects of Exposure to Low Zearalenone Concentrations Close to the EU Recommended Value on Weaned Piglets' Colon

期刊

TOXINS
卷 15, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/toxins15030206

关键词

piglets; zearalenone; microbiota; short chain fatty acids

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Pigs are highly sensitive to zearalenone (ZEN) contamination, especially after weaning, and it can have adverse effects on their health. There are no clear regulations regarding the maximum limit of ZEN in piglet feed, so further investigations are needed. This study examines the effects of different concentrations of ZEN on the microbiota, SCFA synthesis, and various markers in the colon of young pigs.
Pigs are the most sensitive animal to zearalenone (ZEN) contamination, especially after weaning, with acute deleterious effects on different health parameters. Although recommendations not to exceed 100 mu g/kg in piglets feed exists (2006/576/EC), there are no clear regulations concerning the maximum limit in feed for piglets, which means that more investigations are necessary to establish a guidance value. Due to these reasons, the present study aims to investigate if ZEN, at a concentration lower than the EC recommendation for piglets, might affect the microbiota or induce changes in SCFA synthesis and can trigger modifications of nutritional, physiological, and immunological markers in the colon (intestinal integrity through junction protein analysis and local immunity through IgA production). Consequently, the effect of two concentrations of zearalenone were tested, one below the limit recommended by the EC (75 mu g/kg) and a higher one (290 mu g/kg) for comparison reasons. Although exposure to contaminated feed with 75 mu g ZEN/kg feed did not significantly affect the observed parameters, the 290 mu g/kg feed altered several microbiota population abundances and the secretory IgA levels. The obtained results contribute to a better understanding of the adverse effects that ZEN can have in the colon of young pigs in a dose-dependent manner.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据