4.3 Article

Exploration of the Glass Domain in the SiO2-B2O3-TiO2-La2O3 System

期刊

SILICON
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s12633-023-02351-4

关键词

Borosilicate; La2O3; Mechanical; DTA; Makishima and Mackenzie's

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The conventional melting and annealing procedure was used to manufacture glass matrices with a nominal composition of x La2O3-(20 - x)TiO2-23SiO(2)-57B(2)O(3) and a gradual partial replacement of TiO2 by La2O3. X-ray diffraction (XRD), pulse-echo technique, and differential thermal analysis (DTA) were used to examine the effects of La(2)O(3)3 content on the TiO2-B(2)O(3)3-SiO2 glass. The results showed that the glass transition temperature increased with an increase in La2O3 content, and the elastic properties of the glass also improved.
The conventional melting and annealing procedure were used to manufacture glass matrices with a nominal composition of x La2O3-(20 - x)TiO2-23SiO(2)-57B(2)O(3) and a gradual partial replacement of TiO2 by La2O3. The present study uses X-ray diffraction (XRD), pulse-echo technique, and differential thermal analysis (DTA) to examine the effects of La(2)O(3)3 content on the TiO2-B(2)O(3)3-SiO2 glass. The amorphous structure of the samples was confirmed by (XRD) investigations. The DTA curve showed that the glass transition temperature increased between 501 and 566 degrees C with an increase in La2O3 content. The elastic properties of the glass were established by utilizing variations in density and ultrasonic velocities. The pulse-echo technique examinations revealed an increase in the ultrasonic velocities, the Debye temperature, the micro-hardness, the connectivity of fractal bonds, the Poisson's ratio, and the mechanical parameters. For prepared glasses, Makishima-theory Mackenzie's has also been shown to be applicable. Additionally, the majority of the experimentally determined elastic moduli and Poisson's ratio values are in good agreement with values estimated using Makishima and Mackenzie's model.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据