4.7 Review

Adhesion of Conventional, 3D-Printed and Milled Artificial Teeth to Resin Substrates for Complete Dentures: A Narrative Review

期刊

POLYMERS
卷 15, 期 11, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/polym15112488

关键词

3D-prinitng; acrylic denture teeth; CAD/CAM; milling; complete dentures; adhesion

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This review investigates the adhesion of artificial teeth to denture resin substrates fabricated by conventional and digital methods. Chemical and mechanical treatments are commonly used to improve denture teeth retention, but their benefits are controversial. Incompatibility of materials and lack of copolymerization are major reasons for failure. 3D-printed combinations of teeth and denture base resins show lower bond strength and suboptimal failure modes compared to milled and conventional combinations.
Background: One type of failure in complete or partial dentures is the detachment of resin teeth from denture base resin (DBR). This common complication is also observed in the new generation of digitally fabricated dentures. The purpose of this review was to provide an update on the adhesion of artificial teeth to denture resin substrates fabricated by conventional and digital methods.Methods: A search strategy was applied to retrieve relevant studies in PubMed and Scopus. Results: Chemical (monomers, ethyl acetone, conditioning liquids, adhesive agents, etc.) and mechanical (grinding, laser, sandblasting, etc.) treatments are commonly used by technicians to improve denture teeth retention with controversial benefits. Better performance in conventional dentures is realized for certain combinations of DBR materials and denture teeth after mechanical or chemical treatment.Conclusions: The incompatibility of certain materials and lack of copolymerization are the main reasons for failure. Due to the emerging field of new techniques for denture fabrication, different materials have been developed, and further research is needed to elaborate the best combination of teeth and DBRs. Lower bond strength and suboptimal failure modes have been related to 3D-printed combinations of teeth and DBRs, while milled and conventional combinations seem to be a safer choice until further improvements in printing technologies are developed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据