4.7 Review

Research Progress in Hemicellulose-Based Nanocomposite Film as Food Packaging

期刊

POLYMERS
卷 15, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/polym15040979

关键词

hemicellulose; film; nanomaterial; blending modification

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hemicellulose, as a main component of agricultural and forestry biomass, has abundant source, biodegradability, nontoxicity and good biocompatibility. However, the mechanical properties and barrier properties of hemicellulose films are not sufficient, and modification for enhancement is still a challenge. Therefore, blending hemicellulose with nanofibers or nanoparticles has attracted research attention for efficient improvement in properties and cost efficiency in food packaging.
As the main component of agricultural and forestry biomass, hemicellulose has the advantages of having an abundant source, biodegradability, nontoxicity and good biocompatibility. Its application in food packaging has thus become the focus of efficient utilization of biomass resources. However, due to its special molecular structure and physical and chemical characteristics, the mechanical properties and barrier properties of hemicellulose films are not sufficient, and modification for performance enhancement is still a challenge. In the field of food packaging materials preparation, modification of hemicellulose through blending with nanofibers or nanoparticles, both inorganic and organic, has attracted research attention because this approach offers the advantages of efficient improvement in the expected properties and better cost efficiency. In this paper, the composition of hemicellulose, the classification of nanofillers and the research status of hemicellulose-based nanocomposite films are reviewed. The research progress in modification of hemicellulose by using layered silicate, inorganic nanoparticles and organic nanoparticles in food packaging is described. Challenges and outlook of research in hemicellulose-based nanocomposite film in food packaging is discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据