4.7 Article

Three-Dimensional Printing Process for Musical Instruments: Sound Reflection Properties of Polymeric Materials for Enhanced Acoustical Performance

期刊

POLYMERS
卷 15, 期 9, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/polym15092025

关键词

sound reflection coefficient; musical instrument; fused deposition modeling; 3D printing; surface texture

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The acoustical properties of PLA, PET-G, and ASA materials were studied for their potential use in 3D printing of stringed musical instruments. The study used the transfer function method to analyze sound reflection and measured surface geometry parameters (Sa, Sq, Sz, and Sdr) to investigate their relation to acoustic performance. The results showed that higher layer heights and faster printing processes did not necessarily result in poorer acoustical properties. The proposed methodology provided an easy and rapid way to test the acoustic performance and printing parameters of different materials at the beginning of the production process.
Acoustical properties of various materials were analyzed in order to determine their potential for the utilization in the three-dimensional printing process of stringed musical instruments. Polylactic acid (PLA), polyethylene terephthalate with glycol modification (PET-G), and acrylonitrile styrene acrylate (ASA) filaments were studied in terms of sound reflection using the transfer function method. In addition, the surface geometry parameters (Sa, Sq, Sz, and Sdr) were measured, and their relation to the acoustic performance of three-dimensional-printed samples was investigated. It was found that a higher layer height, and thus a faster printing process, does not necessarily mean poor acoustical properties. The proposed methodology also proved to be a relatively easy and rapid way to test the acoustic performance of various materials and the effect of three-dimensional printing parameters to test such a combination at the very beginning of the production process.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据