4.7 Article

Robust, Flame-Retardant, and Anti-Corrosive Waterborne Polyurethane Enabled by a PN Synergistic Flame-Retardant Containing Benzimidazole and Phosphinate Groups

期刊

POLYMERS
卷 15, 期 10, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/polym15102400

关键词

waterborne polyurethanes; flame reaction; corrosion resistance; mechanical properties; emulsion stability

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Waterborne polyurethanes (WPUs) are environmentally friendly and widely used in production and daily life, but they are flammable. This study presents a novel flame-retardant additive, BIEP-ETA, which improves the flame resistance of WPUs by forming hydrogen bonds and phosphorus nitrogen synergistic effect. The WPU blends (WPU/FRs) showed improved fire-retardant effect, emulsion stability, mechanical properties, and corrosion resistance.
Waterborne polyurethanes (WPUs) have attracted great interest owing to their environmentally friendly properties, and are wildly applied in production and daily life. However, waterborne polyurethanes are flammable. Up to now, the challenge remains to prepare WPUs with excellent flame resistance, high emulsion stability, and outstanding mechanical properties. Herein, a novel flame-retardant additive, 2-hydroxyethan-1-aminium (2-(1H-benzo[d]imidazol-2-yl)ethyl)(phenyl)phosphinate (BIEP-ETA) has been synthesized and applied to improve the flame resistance of WPUs, which has both phosphorus nitrogen synergistic effect and the ability to form hydrogen bonds with WPUs. The WPU blends (WPU/FRs) exhibited a positive fire-retardant effect in both the vapor and condensed phases, with significantly improved self-extinguishing performance and reduced heat release value. Interestingly, thanks to the good compatibility between BIEP-ETA and WPUs, WPU/FRs not only have higher emulsion stability, but also have better mechanical properties with synchronously improved tensile strength and toughness. Moreover, WPU/FRs also exhibit excellent potential as a corrosion-resistant coating.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据