4.7 Article

Synthesis and Characterization of Spirocyclic Mid-Block Containing Triblock Copolymer

期刊

POLYMERS
卷 15, 期 7, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/polym15071677

关键词

ATRP; cyclic polymer; liquid chromatographic analysis; block copolymer

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, a synthetic strategy for the preparation of a triblock copolymer containing a spirocyclic mid-block is reported. A spirocyclic polystyrene (cPS) mid-block was synthesized by atom transfer radical polymerization (ATRP) and subsequent azidation and cycloaddition reactions. The resulting functional cPS was purified using liquid chromatography techniques. The cPS was then esterified to obtain a macro-ATRP initiator for the synthesis of a poly(methyl methacrylate)-block-cPS-block-poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA-b-cPS-b-PMMA) triblock copolymer. This work provides a synthetic strategy for the preparation of a spirocyclic macroinitiator for the ATRP technique and introduces liquid chromatographic techniques for the purification of (spiro) cyclic polymers.
Polymers containing cyclic derivatives are a new class of macromolecular topologies with unique properties. Herein, we report the synthesis of a triblock copolymer containing a spirocyclic mid-block. To achieve this, a spirocyclic polystyrene (cPS) mid-block was first synthesized by atom transfer radical polymerization (ATRP) using a tetra-functional initiator, followed by end-group azidation and a copper (I)-catalyzed azide-alkyne cycloaddition reaction. The resulting functional cPS was purified using liquid chromatography techniques. Following the esterification of cPS, a macro-ATRP initiator was obtained and used to synthesize a poly (methyl methacrylate)-block-cPS-block-poly (methyl methacrylate) (PMMA-b-cPS-b-PMMA) triblock copolymer. This work provides a synthetic strategy for the preparation of a spirocyclic macroinitiator for the ATRP technique and as well as liquid chromatographic techniques for the purification of (spiro) cyclic polymers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据