4.7 Article

Cyclic Deformation and Fatigue Failure Mechanisms of Thermoplastic Polyurethane in High Cycle Fatigue

期刊

POLYMERS
卷 15, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/polym15040899

关键词

thermoplastic polyurethane; microphase separation; mechanical properties; hydrogen bond; fracture morphology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The main purpose of this study is to analyze the fatigue failure of thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU) plate under tension-tension load control tests and investigate the change in hydrogen bond content. The results indicate that the S-N curve of TPU material exhibits a declining trend before reaching the fatigue limit, with energy consumption occurring during the cyclic creep process and undergoing three stages of hard segment and soft segment changes. The study also reveals that an increase in fatigue life leads to a decrease in hydrogen bond content and an increase in microphase separation, resulting in fatigue fracture.
In this study, the main purpose is to analyze the fatigue failure of thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU) plate under tension-tension load control tests (frequency = 5 Hz, stress ratio = 0.1) and consider the change in hydrogen bond content. The results show that the S-N curve of TPU material shows a downward trend before reaching the fatigue limit (10.25 MPa), and the energy is continuously consumed during the cyclic creep process and undergoes three stages of the hard segment and the soft segment changes. The infrared spectrum study shows that the increase in fatigue life will lead to more physical crosslinking, resulting in the reduction of hydrogen bond content, and the increase in microphase separation, leading to the occurrence of fatigue fracture. In addition, the scanning electron microscope and three-dimensional confocal analysis showed that the crack originated from the aggregation of micropores on the surface of the material and was accompanied by the slip of the molecular chain, the crack propagation direction was at an angle of about 45 degrees.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据