Why does the X chromosome lag behind autosomes in GWAS findings?

The X-chromosome is among the largest human chromosomes. It differs from autosomes by a number of important features including hemizygosity in males, an almost complete inactivation of one copy in females, and unique patterns of recombination. We used data from the Catalog of Published Genome Wide Association Studies to compare densities of the GWAS-detected SNPs on the X-chromosome and autosomes. The density of GWAS-detected SNPs on the X-chromosome is 6-fold lower compared to the density of the GWAS-detected SNPs on autosomes. Differences between the X-chromosome and autosomes cannot be explained by differences in the overall SNP density, lower X-chromosome coverage by genotyping platforms or low call rate of X-chromosomal SNPs. Similar differences in the density of GWAS-detected SNPs were found in female-only GWASs (e.g. ovarian cancer GWASs). We hypothesized that the lower density of GWAS-detected SNPs on the X-chromosome compared to autosomes is not a result of a methodological bias, e.g. differences in coverage or call rates, but has a real underlying biological reason-a lower density of functional SNPs on the X-chromosome versus autosomes. This hypothesis is supported by the observation that (i) the overall SNP density of X-chromosome is lower compared to the SNP density on autosomes and that (ii) the density of genic SNPs on the X-chromosome is lower compared to autosomes while densities of intergenic SNPs are similar. Author summaryOne of the most striking observations from the Genome Wide Association Studies (GWAS) is that the density of GWAS hits is much lower on X-chromosome compared to autosomes. This was initially explained by technical/analytical reasons such as lower coverage and lack of adequate methods to analyze X-chromosomal SNPs. Since then, a better coverage and better analytical methods to analyze X-chromosomal SNPs were developed. We recently revisited the issue and found that the density of GWAS hits on X-chromosome is at least 5-fold lower compared to autosomes. We demonstrated that the difference cannot be explained by technical or analytical reasons. We proposed a hypothesis of a real biological phenomenon underlying X versus autosomal differences in the density of GWAS-detected SNPs, namely that X-chromosome has a lower density of functional polymorphisms compared to autosomes because of a stronger selection against X-chromosomal mutations since X-chromosomal variants are more exposed to natural selection due to hemizygosity in males and X-chromosome inactivation in females. The hypothesis is supported by the analysis of the densities of intergenic, intronic and exonic SNPs on human chromosomes.

Automated summary

The X-chromosome has a lower density of GWAS-detected SNPs compared to autosomes, which cannot be explained by methodological bias. This lower density may be due to a real biological reason - a lower density of functional SNPs on the X-chromosome compared to autosomes. This hypothesis is supported by the analysis of overall SNP density and genic versus intergenic SNP densities.