4.6 Article

Sparse multi-trait genomic prediction under balanced incomplete block design

期刊

PLANT GENOME
卷 16, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/tpg2.20305

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Sparse testing is crucial for improving the efficiency of genomic selection by reducing the number of genotypes evaluated. We evaluated four methods for allocating lines to environments and found that M4 was the best method, while M1 was the worst. There were no significant differences between M3 and M4. We concluded that both M4 and M3 are efficient in the context of sparse testing for multi-trait prediction.
Sparse testing is essential to increase the efficiency of the genomic selection methodology, as the same efficiency (in this case prediction power) can be obtained while using less genotypes evaluated in the fields. For this reason, it is important to evaluate the existing methods for performing the allocation of lines to environments. With this goal, four methods (M1-M4) to allocate lines to environments were evaluated under the context of a multi-trait genomic prediction problem: M1 denotes the allocation of a fraction (subset) of lines in all locations, M2 denotes the allocation of a fraction of lines with some shared lines in locations but not arranged based on the balanced incomplete block design (BIBD) principle, M3 denotes the random allocation of a subset of lines to locations, and M4 denotes the allocation of a subset of lines to locations using the BIBD principle. The evaluation was done using seven real multi-environment data sets common in plant breeding programs. We found that the best method was M4 and the worst was M1, while no important differences were found between M3 and M4. We concluded that M4 and M3 are efficient in the context of sparse testing for multi-trait prediction.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据