4.7 Review

Fundamental Understanding and Optimization Strategies for Dual-Ion Batteries: A Review

期刊

NANO-MICRO LETTERS
卷 15, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

SHANGHAI JIAO TONG UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1007/s40820-023-01086-6

关键词

Dual-ion batteries; Reaction mechanisms; Optimization strategies; Energy storage

向作者/读者索取更多资源

There is a growing demand for rechargeable batteries with high-energy density and long-cycle life to meet the requirements of next-generation energy storage systems. Dual-ion batteries (DIBs) have attracted significant attention due to their advantages of high working voltage, safety, and environmental friendliness. However, the imbalance between electrodes and the mismatch of electrolyte systems pose challenges. Therefore, overall optimization of anode materials, cathode materials, and compatible electrolyte systems is urgently needed to fully exploit the advantages of DIBs.
There has been increasing demand for high-energy density and long-cycle life rechargeable batteries to satisfy the ever-growing requirements for next-generation energy storage systems. Among all available candidates, dual-ion batteries (DIBs) have drawn tremendous attention in the past few years from both academic and industrial battery communities because of their fascinating advantages of high working voltage, excellent safety, and environmental friendliness. However, the dynamic imbalance between the electrodes and the mismatch of traditional electrolyte systems remain elusive. To fully employ the advantages of DIBs, the overall optimization of anode materials, cathode materials, and compatible electrolyte systems is urgently needed. Here, we review the development history and the reaction mechanisms involved in DIBs. Afterward, the optimization strategies toward DIB materials and electrolytes are highlighted. In addition, their energy-related applications are also provided. Lastly, the research challenges and possible development directions of DIBs are outlined.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据