4.4 Article

Evaluation of the effects of the presence of ZnO- TiO2 (50%-50%) on the thermal conductivity of Ethylene Glycol base fluid and its estimation using Artificial Neural Network for industrial and commercial applications

期刊

JOURNAL OF SAUDI CHEMICAL SOCIETY
卷 27, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jscs.2023.101613

关键词

ZnO; TiO2; Thermal conductivity; Artificial Neural Networks

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study predicted the thermal conductivity (knf) of ZnO-TiO2 (50% - 50%)/ Ethylene Glycol hybrid nanofluid using Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs). The nanofluid was prepared at different volume fractions (u) of nanoparticles (u = 0.001 to 0.035) and temperatures (T = 25 to 50 degrees C). The study introduced an algorithm to determine the optimal number of neurons in the hidden layer and used a surface fitting method for knf prediction. The results showed that ANN method outperformed the fitting method in terms of knf prediction, with better MAE and correlation coefficient.
In this study, the thermal conductivity (knf) of ZnO-TiO2 (50 %-50 %)/ Ethylene Glycol hybrid nanofluid using Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs) was predicted. The nanofluid was pre-pared at different volume fractions (u) of nanoparticles (u = 0.001 to 0.035) and temperatures (T = 25 to 50 degrees C). In this study, an algorithm is presented to find the best neuron number in the hidden layer. Also, a surface fitting method has been applied to predict the knf of nanofluid. Finally, the correlation coefficients, performances, and Maximum Absolute Error (MAE) for both methods have been presented and compared. It could be understood that the ANN method had a better abil-ity in predicting the knf of nanofluid compared to the fitting method. This method not only showed better performance but also reached a better MAE and correlation coefficient.(c) 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of King Saud University. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据