4.5 Article

Age of First Use, Age of Habitual Use, and Problematic Alcohol Use: a Cross-cultural Examination Among Young Adults in Seven Countries

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11469-023-01016-y

关键词

Age of first use; Age of habitual use; Alcohol; Cross-cultural; Young adults

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Earlier age of alcohol use initiation has been consistently associated with later problematic alcohol use. It is unclear which aspect of early initiation is key for risk assessment and whether cultural differences exist. This study examined the relationships between Age of First Use (AFU) and Age of Habitual Use (AHU) on alcohol use behaviors across seven countries. Results show that AFU has a stronger association with drinking frequency, while AHU is more strongly associated with AUDIT scores and negative consequences. Country was found to moderate the relationships between age variables and drinking behaviors.
Earlier age of alcohol use initiation has been consistently associated with later problematic alcohol use. However, it is unclear what aspect of early initiation is key for risk assessment and whether there are cultural differences. The present study examined relationships between Age of First Use (AFU) and Age of Habitual Use (AHU) on alcohol use behaviors across seven countries (USA, England, Argentina, Uruguay, Spain, Canada, South Africa). Participants were 5336 college students reporting past month alcohol consumption. Participants provided information, via online survey, on AFU, AHU, and current drinking behaviors. Results demonstrated significant direct associations between age variables and all outcomes, except for AHU to drinking frequency. Furthermore, AFU demonstrated stronger associations with drinking frequency, while AHU was more strongly associated with AUDIT scores and negative consequences. A moderation effect of country was discovered among several regression paths. These findings suggest AHU should receive greater focus in alcohol research.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据