4.6 Review

Imaging blood-brain barrier dysfunction: A state-of-the-art review from a clinical perspective

期刊

FRONTIERS IN AGING NEUROSCIENCE
卷 15, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fnagi.2023.1132077

关键词

blood-brain barrier dysfunction; diagnostic imaging; magnetic resonance imaging; neurodegeneration; positron emission tomography

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The blood-brain barrier (BBB) plays a crucial role in protecting the brain's microenvironment, and dysfunction of BBB could lead to neuroinflammatory events and neuronal degeneration. BBB imaging has the potential to be an early diagnostic and prognostic biomarker for neurological diseases. However, further advances are needed in terms of validation, standardization, and implementation of affordable and non-contrast BBB imaging techniques.
The blood-brain barrier (BBB) consists of specialized cells that tightly regulate the in- and outflow of molecules from the blood to brain parenchyma, protecting the brain's microenvironment. If one of the BBB components starts to fail, its dysfunction can lead to a cascade of neuroinflammatory events leading to neuronal dysfunction and degeneration. Preliminary imaging findings suggest that BBB dysfunction could serve as an early diagnostic and prognostic biomarker for a number of neurological diseases. This review aims to provide clinicians with an overview of the emerging field of BBB imaging in humans by answering three key questions: (1. Disease) In which diseases could BBB imaging be useful? (2. Device) What are currently available imaging methods for evaluating BBB integrity? And (3. Distribution) what is the potential of BBB imaging in different environments, particularly in resource limited settings? We conclude that further advances are needed, such as the validation, standardization and implementation of readily available, low-cost and non-contrast BBB imaging techniques, for BBB imaging to be a useful clinical biomarker in both resource-limited and well-resourced settings.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据