4.7 Article

Topographical Influence on Snag Distribution in a Subtropical Forest in South China

期刊

FORESTS
卷 14, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/f14050997

关键词

standing dead trees; elevation; slope steepness; slope aspect; canonical correspondence analysis

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, the relationship between snags and topographic factors in a secondary forest in South China was analyzed. A total of 544 snags were recorded, with Castanopsis carlesii and Schima superba being the most frequent species. Snags mainly derived from saplings and small trees, and their presence decreased with increased diameter and height after 25 years of logging. The spatial distribution of snags displayed an aggregated pattern, strongly correlated with elevation, slope steepness, and slope aspect. These findings contribute to our understanding of forest dynamics and provide insights for forest management and biodiversity conservation.
Snags are highly important for many wildlife species and ecological processes. In this study, we analyzed the relationship between snags and topographic factors in a secondary forest plot in South China. Data on 544 snags were collected and recorded from 236 subplots in a permanent plot (400 subplots). The frequency of Castanopsis carlesii and Schima superba was higher than that of other species. The snags derived mostly from saplings and small trees, and the presence of snags decreased as the DBH and height increased after 25 years of logging. The snags displayed an aggregated spatial pattern distribution, which was strongly correlated with elevation, slope steepness, and slope aspect (p < 0.05), as revealed by canonical correspondence analysis (CCA); however, the response of snags varied with topographic factors. Our results demonstrate that topography is an important factor that affects the snag spatial distribution in the subtropical secondary forest. These results will further improve our understanding of forest dynamics and provide guidance for forest management and biodiversity conservation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据