4.7 Article

Estimating Forest Above-Ground Biomass in Central Amazonia Using Polarimetric Attributes of ALOS/PALSAR Images

期刊

FORESTS
卷 14, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/f14050941

关键词

tropical forest biomass; forest scattering components; polarimetric attributes; parallel polarimetric responses; ALOS; PALSAR

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We developed a method for estimating above-ground biomass (AGB) from polarimetric SAR images. The model used power and phase-radar attributes, as well as attributes from Touzi decomposition. The proposed model showed good predictive capacity and a positive correlation with the validation results.
Polarimetric synthetic aperture radar (SAR) images are essential to understand forest structure and plan forest inventories with the purpose of natural resource management and environmental conservation efforts. We developed a method for estimating above-ground biomass (AGB) from power and phase-radar attributes in L-band images. The model was based on the variables P-v (from Freeman-Durden decomposition) and s degrees(HH), complemented by the attributes of Touzi decomposition a(S)(2), t(m), f(S)(3), and f(S)(2). The analyses demonstrated the contribution of volumetric, multiple, and direct scattering resulting from the interaction between the signal and the random structure of canopies and their forest biomass. The proposed model had good predictive capacity and a positive correlation (R-2 = 0.67 and = 0.81, respectively), with Syx = 56.9 Mg ha(-1) and a low average estimation error of 7.5% at R-2 = 0.81 in the validation. An additional exploratory analysis of the parallel polarimetric responses did not reveal a defined pattern for the different phytophysiognomies-although all indicated a predominance of multiple and/or volumetric scattering. This fact can be related to the floristic and structural variation in the primary forest units, the degree of human intervention in legal logging, and the differences among succession stages.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据